Since the benefit-cost ratio for the optimistic scenario is so low, it did not seem necessary to consider a pessimistic scenario which would consider possibilities of higher costs or that the tunnels created greater environmental damage than predicted in the proponents' documents. While 23 cents of benefit per dollar of cost is bad, the reality could be even worse.
A link to the full report and a summary table of results is below.
http://www.pacific.edu/Documents/school-business/BFC/WaterFix%20benefit%20cost.pdf
Present Value of Benefits and Costs of the California WaterFix.
2014 dollars, 3.5% real discount rate,
15 years of construction, and 100 years of operation.
|
Base
scenario
|
Optimistic
Scenario
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Export Water Supply
|
$1,319,521,208
|
$2,822,409,124
|
Export Water Quality
|
$1,677,361,307
|
$1,677,361,307
|
Earthquake Risk
Reduction
|
$0
|
$435,796,554
|
Total
Benefits
|
$2,996,882,515
|
$4,935,566,984
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Construction and
Mitigation
|
$11,676,474,531
|
$11,676,474,531
|
Operation and
Maintenance
|
$591,658,075
|
$591,658,075
|
Ecosystem
|
$0
|
$0
|
In-Delta Municipal
|
$111,279,332
|
$37,093,107
|
In-Delta Agriculture
|
$682,807,143
|
$293,953,421
|
In-Delta Transportation
|
$132,205,755
|
$132,205,755
|
Total
Costs
|
$13,194,424,836
|
$12,731,384,889
|
|
|
|
Net
Benefit
|
($10,197,542,281)
|
($7,795,817,905)
|
Benefit/Cost
ratio
|
0.23
|
0.39
|
hi your web site is visit.it is naturally information
ReplyDeletethank you.
bussness